CATDOLL: Is making sequels to old animations a sign of laziness or a way to cater to middle-aged people?

CATDOLL: Is making sequels to old animations a sign of laziness or a way to cater to middle-aged people?

After years of development, every generation has its own contemporary animation that they grew up with. Over time, when people grow up, it naturally becomes a classic.

But when this group of people grow up, which is the era we are in now, in addition to the regular release of new animations, you will also see many old animations, both those you have heard of and those you have not heard of, all have remakes, refurbished reruns, etc. These actions are pointed out by Japanese animation fans that the animation industry always relies on the masterpieces of the past, and these animations can only cater to the tastes of middle-aged people (yes, that's right, there is a big difference between the animations of the past and the animations of today, after all, times are changing. It is not unreasonable that young people today cannot accept the animations of the past.)

But apart from this, there are some people who think that "although these animations are classics, the industry is lazy and just wants to make money from uncles and aunts." I wonder what everyone thinks about this?

The reason for these problems is the news that Japan Rent will make sequels to classic TV animations such as "Young Abe" and "Nuannuan Diary". Among them, "Young Abe" is a comic serialized in Shueisha from 1988 to 1999.

<<:  CATDOLL: Anime Starry Sky Evening News: The screenwriter of the movie "Popeye" is confirmed to adapt the comic "Super Brothers"

>>:  CATDOLL: Domestic construction site safety propaganda cartoons go viral online, easy to understand and liked by netizens

Recommend